| And
the choppy editing? Actually, this was a very practical
decision that served many purposes.
First, there was the video problem. Though the digital quality
of video has improved greatly, it still does not compare
to film, and if a movie is shot on video, it tends to look
a lot like a soap opera. One way I figured we could get
around this, is by moving the camera.
Besides soap operas, people are also used to seeing video
in news or documentaries. So if I wanted the video image
to work and not feel like a soap opera, I figured I could
give the feel of realistic live-action. Hence, the moving
camera.
Secondly, there was the problem
of being in one location for the entire movie. After awhile
just staring an images of talking heads can get boring.
Film is an action medium and needs to movement to work.
Since there was no movement happening in front of the camera,
I figured we could liven things up by moving the camera
itself.
Thirdly, there was the problem of many non-professional
actors. Though everyone in the movie was very talented,
very few were experienced. So I had to figure out a way
to get natural performances out of them.
I decided to do this by shooting the entire scenes in one
take and allowing the actors to ad-lib around the dialogue
to make themselves more comfortable. Then in the editing,
I edited out most of the ad-libbing and left just the dialogue
from the script. That's why it appears so choppy.
Lastly, time is money and we didn't have a lot. So, in order
to make things quick and easy, we shot everything handheld
from one essentially one spot for every scene. This made
it easy to manage on the set as I was trying to act as well
as direct and produce.
|